Preferences of community public advisory group members for characteristics of Canadian forest tenures in pursuit of sustainable forest management objectives

C. Kruger, Peter Boxall and Martin Luckert

Forest Policy and Economics, 2013, vol. 26, issue C, 121-130

Abstract: Community involvement, a recognized cornerstone of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) in many jurisdictions, often relies on Public Advisory Groups (PAGs) to inform forest management planning. This study analyzes perceptions of PAG members in Canada regarding how forest tenures promote or inhibit the pursuit of three SFM objectives: competitiveness, environmental integrity and community stability. The analysis uses data from ratings questions and a best–worst choice experiment. Our results suggest that most respondents in both western and eastern Canada believed that the current structure of tenures meet the SFM objectives. However, results show significant differences between eastern and western respondents. For competitiveness, eastern respondents suggested that duration and flexibility in operational and harvesting requirements were most important, while western respondents indicated that flexibility in operational requirements and harvest levels were most important. The results also indicate, however, that support from PAG members for governments to alter tenure characteristics may be limited, particularly in the east. For western respondents, there was some agreement (i.e. more people agreeing than disagreeing) regarding: increasing tenure duration, decreasing flexibility in operational requirements, and increasing flexibility of harvest levels. Though our overall findings suggest that PAG members are generally satisfied with current tenure arrangements, questions remain regarding what segments of society these members represent, and whether sufficient attention has been given to the complex relationships between structures of forest tenures and the pursuit of SFM.

Keywords: Best–worst analysis; Forest tenures; Community preferences; Sustainable forest management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934112002213
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:26:y:2013:i:c:p:121-130

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.010

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().