EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inequality and small landholdings: Path dependence, land use and wellbeing

Senwei Huang, Yaoqi Zhang, Yifang Zheng, Shipeng Su and Jing Zheng

Forest Policy and Economics, 2019, vol. 98, issue C, 62-66

Abstract: China economic reform was initiated from rural land tenure reforms, leading up to four decades of fast economic growth. Small but more unequal land holding has been viewed as a dilemma for future development. Using data from rural households in three provinces, this paper attempts to quantitatively measure and examine land holding inequality between farmland and woodland across different regions. It was argued that the paths of land tenure reforms could play an important role: all farmland was allocated to households via administrative mechanism according to household size at the beginning of the economic reforms while woodland was allocated to households from the collective using market mechanism. The inequality between farmland and woodland also come from land uses because farmland is primarily used for food production for own consumption whereas woodland is used to produce products for sale. The determinants of the current holding size of land were compared and investigated. The role of wellbeing like household income is found statistically significant in forestland but not farmland. In contrast, the size of household is found statistically significant in farmland but not forestland.

Keywords: Household; Land tenure reform; Inequality; Economic development; Land market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934118302375
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:98:y:2019:i:c:p:62-66

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2019-01-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:98:y:2019:i:c:p:62-66