EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are more corporate social investments better? Evidence of non-linearity effect on costs of U.S. Bank loans

Sung C. Bae, Kiyoung Chang and Ha-Chin Yi

Global Finance Journal, 2018, vol. 38, issue C, 82-96

Abstract: We explore a research issue of whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities have a monotonic relationship with the cost of bank debt. Employing extensive data of private syndicated loans issued by U.S. firms, we find that the benefit of CSR strengths is not monotonic but declines at a decreasing rate, relative to the loan spread of private bank loans. Our findings indicate that there is an optimal level of CSR engagement with respect to the cost of debt. Undocumented for U.S. firms in the CSR literature, our results offer new evidence on the non-linearity effect of CSR on debt financing costs and suggest that a borrower's CSR investments beyond an optimal level are viewed as ineffective and wasteful.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; Loan spread; Non-linearity effect; U.S. syndicated loans (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G24 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028318300644
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:glofin:v:38:y:2018:i:c:p:82-96

DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2018.03.002

Access Statistics for this article

Global Finance Journal is currently edited by Manuchehr Shahrokhi

More articles in Global Finance Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:38:y:2018:i:c:p:82-96