Capital structure of Islamic banks: How different are they from conventional banks?
Hafiz Hoque and
Global Finance Journal, 2022, vol. 54, issue C
This paper uses comprehensive data for 112 Islamic and 709 conventional banks from 23 countries over 1995–2015 to compare the capital structure of Islamic banks (IBs) and conventional banks (CBs) from several perspectives. We find that IBs and CBs seem to face different cost pressures in the process of adjusting towards the target capital structure. Asset growth is a key driver of capital structure change, and CBs adjust leverage more aggressively in response to changes in total assets compared to IBs, because they have an advantage in obtaining external funds and can achieve leverage adjustments faster and at a low cost. IBs have more regulatory capital, but their ability to respond to risks is weaker than traditional banks. The results of this paper suggest that Islamic banks are in a disadvantaged position compared to CBs in capital structure management. The conclusion suggests that IBs need to expand its financing tools and funding sources to reduce adjustment costs and improve their capability to deal with asset risk.
Keywords: Islamic banking; Capital structure; Trade-off theory; Asset growth; Regulatory capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G21 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:glofin:v:54:y:2022:i:c:s1044028321000326
Access Statistics for this article
Global Finance Journal is currently edited by Manuchehr Shahrokhi
More articles in Global Finance Journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().