A systematic review of coverage decision-making on health technologies—Evidence from the real world

Katharina Elisabeth Fischer
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Katharina Elisabeth Blankart

Health Policy, 2012, vol. 107, issue 2, 218-230

Abstract: Quantitative analysis of real-world coverage decision-making offers insights into the revealed preferences of appraisal committees. Aim of this review was to structure empirical evidence of coverage decisions made in practice based on the components ‘methods and evidence’, ‘criteria and standards’, ‘decision outcome’ and ‘processes’.

Keywords: Fourth hurdle; Reimbursement; Resource allocation; Pharmaceutical; Drug formulary; Quantitative methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851012001911
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:107:y:2012:i:2:p:218-230

DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.07.005

Access Statistics for this article

Health Policy is currently edited by Katrien Kesteloot, Mia Defever and Irina Cleemput

More articles in Health Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu () and ().