Determinants of the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs) by community pharmacies in England: A multi-method study
Fay Bradley,
Andrew C. Wagner,
Rebecca Elvey,
Peter R. Noyce and
Darren M. Ashcroft
Health Policy, 2008, vol. 88, issue 2-3, 258-268
Abstract:
Objectives To explore and identify the key determinants influencing the uptake of medicines use reviews (MURs), a new community pharmacy service in England.Methods Survey of all primary care organisations (PCOs) in England (n = 303, response rate = 74%) and case study investigations of 10 PCOs, involving interviews with a purposive sample of 43 key stakeholders, including PCO, Local Pharmaceutical Committee and community pharmacy representatives. National data on MUR activity were also analysed and multiple linear regression was used to test determinants of MUR uptake.Results The ownership category of the pharmacy was shown to be the most significant determinant of MUR uptake. Rates of MUR provision by multiple pharmacies were almost twice that of independent pharmacies. Interview data corroborated this finding, suggesting that organisational pressure within multiple pharmacies was driving forward MUR activity in some PCOs. Interviewees expressed concern about this quantity driven approach. The PCO survey respondents perceived the greatest barrier to MUR implementation to be a lack of support from general practitioners (GPs). Interviewees reported a lack of communication about MURs between community pharmacists and GPs.Conclusions The findings suggest that the organisational setting of the pharmacy is an important factor influencing the uptake of MURs. There is also a need for greater communication and collaboration with GPs regarding the MUR service.
Keywords: Community; pharmacy; services; Policy; development; Health; care; delivery; Medicines; use; review; England (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00087-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:88:y:2008:i:2-3:p:258-268
Access Statistics for this article
Health Policy is currently edited by Katrien Kesteloot, Mia Defever and Irina Cleemput
More articles in Health Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu () and ().