Balancing patient preferences and clinical needs: Community versus hospital based care for patients with suspected DVT

Michael Clark, Domenico Moro and Ala Szczepura

Health Policy, 2009, vol. 90, issue 2-3, 313-319

Abstract: Objective To establish patients' preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for different service models for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT).Methods We analysed patient responses to a discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire which had been targeted at patients in Leicester, UK. The questionnaire elicited preferences/WTP for attributes of DVT provision including speed of diagnosis; access; continuity of care; and minimizing hospital visits. Additionally we evaluated trade-offs between clinical and service attributes. We analysed responses from 256 patients with suspected DVT (65% response rate).Results Respondents are WTP £4.82 per extra hour of dedicated DVT service provision; £17.12 per hospital visit avoided; £115.73 per day's reduction in diagnostic wait; and £179.32 for 'much' not 'some' continuity, or £56.88 for 'some' not 'lack' of continuity in nursing.Conclusions Research evaluating different DVT service models usually reports on clinical efficacy in centres of excellence. Results show prompt diagnosis is valued by patients and may improve efficacy by reducing unnecessary anticoagulation. However, patients value 'process' measures such as continuity of care also. To ensure optimal provision, clinical benefit measurement ought to be augmented with information on patients' preferences.

Keywords: Discrete; choice; experiment; DCE; DVT; Preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00213-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:90:y:2009:i:2-3:p:313-319

Access Statistics for this article

Health Policy is currently edited by Katrien Kesteloot, Mia Defever and Irina Cleemput

More articles in Health Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu () and ().