EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The clinical and economic burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients

Mickaël Hiligsmann, Véronique Rabenda, Olivier Bruyère and Jean-Yves Reginster

Health Policy, 2010, vol. 96, issue 2, 170-177

Abstract: Objectives This study aims to estimate the clinical and economic burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients and the potential cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions.Methods A validated Markov microsimulation model estimated costs and outcomes (i.e. the number of fractures and the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)) for three adherence scenarios: no treatment, real-world adherence and full adherence over 3 years. The real-world adherence scenario employed data from a published observational study. The incremental cost per QALY gained was estimated and compared across the three adherence scenarios.Results The number of fractures prevented and the QALY gain obtained at real-world adherence levels represented only 38.2% and 40.7% of those expected with full adherence, respectively. The cost per QALY gained of real-world adherence compared with no treatment was estimated at [euro]10Â 279, and full adherence was found to be cost-saving compared with real-world adherence.Conclusions This study suggests that more than half of the potential clinical benefits from oral bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis are lost due to poor adherence with treatment. Depending on their cost, interventions with improved adherence to therapy have the potential to be an attractive use of resources.

Keywords: Adherence; Compliance; Cost-effectiveness; Economic; analysis; Health; policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(10)00029-1
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:96:y:2010:i:2:p:170-177

Access Statistics for this article

Health Policy is currently edited by Katrien Kesteloot, Mia Defever and Irina Cleemput

More articles in Health Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu () and ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:96:y:2010:i:2:p:170-177