Assessing the impact of state insurance policies on chlamydia screening: A panel data analysis

Kwame Owusu-Edusei and Thomas L. Gift

Health Policy, 2010, vol. 96, issue 3, 231-238

Abstract: Objectives In the late 1990s, three Southern states (Maryland (MD), Georgia (GA) and Tennessee (TN)) enacted laws that required health plans to reimburse for chlamydia screening for the populations at risk. We assessed the impact of the laws on chlamydia screening rates for Georgia (GA) and Tennessee (TN).Methods We extracted monthly chlamydia screening rates on employer-sponsored privately insured women and used a panel regression analysis to conduct an intervention analysis that compared changes in screening rates in Georgia and Tennessee to ten southern states, based on the dates that the laws were enacted in the two states. Maryland was excluded due to non-specificity of the law and insufficient data.Results Although there were substantial increases in screening rates in both GA and TN after the enactment of the laws, data from the other ten states showed similar increases over the same period. Thus, there was no significant difference in the increase in screening rates between Georgia and Tennessee and the other states.Conclusion Because this analysis was restricted to privately insured patients, additional studies are needed to assess the effectiveness (or the lack thereof) of the laws for other populations, such as those covered by Medicaid, within the individual states.

Keywords: Health; policy; Chlamydia; screening; laws; Impact; analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(10)00047-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:96:y:2010:i:3:p:231-238

Access Statistics for this article

Health Policy is currently edited by Katrien Kesteloot, Mia Defever and Irina Cleemput

More articles in Health Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu () and ().