An empirical evaluation of conflict in MNC matrix structure firms
Joachim Wolf and
William G. Egelhoff
International Business Review, 2013, vol. 22, issue 3, 591-601
Abstract:
According to existing theory, MNCs with matrix structures are supposed to have more intra-organizational conflict than non-matrix firms. The present study uses a sample of 82 German MNCs to evaluate and reject this general hypothesis. Only MNCs with a product division by geographical region matrix structure support the hypothesis. Other types of matrix structure which contain a functional division dimension tend to have levels of intra-organizational conflict similar to elementary structures. The paper develops and proposes new logic and two propositions that explain which types of matrix structure lead to greater conflict and which do not. As more MNCs consider using matrix structures to implement increasingly complex strategies, a better understanding of conflict in matrix MNCs is important.
Keywords: Conflict; Matrix structure; MNCs; Organization structure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593112001047
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:iburev:v:22:y:2013:i:3:p:591-601
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... me/133/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.08.005
Access Statistics for this article
International Business Review is currently edited by P. Ghauri
More articles in International Business Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().