Testing Metcalfe's law: Pitfalls and possibilities
Leo Van Hove
Information Economics and Policy, 2016, vol. 37, issue C, 67-76
A small but burgeoning body of literature has tried to assess whether Metcalfe's law provides a realistic yardstick for the value of specific networks. In this paper, I uncover a number of flaws in the extant tests. First, a proper test of Metcalfe's law—or of any of the competing “laws”—requires correct identification of the type(s) of network effects involved and the relevant market(s). Second, a multi-market setting typically calls for scaled network sizes. Third, controlling for intertemporal changes in network quality may be imperative. Finally, indicators at the individual and aggregate levels should not be mixed. Armed with these insights, I re-examined Madureira et al. (2013)’s results. Unlike Madureira et al., I found that Metcalfe's law fits the data better than Briscoe's law.
Keywords: Metcalfe's law; Network value; Network effects; Digital information networks; Internet (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B5 D2 D8 L9 O3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:37:y:2016:i:c:p:67-76
Access Statistics for this article
Information Economics and Policy is currently edited by D. Waterman
More articles in Information Economics and Policy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().