Testing Metcalfe's law: Pitfalls and possibilities

Leo Van Hove

Information Economics and Policy, 2016, vol. 37, issue C, 67-76

Abstract: A small but burgeoning body of literature has tried to assess whether Metcalfe's law provides a realistic yardstick for the value of specific networks. In this paper, I uncover a number of flaws in the extant tests. First, a proper test of Metcalfe's law—or of any of the competing “laws”—requires correct identification of the type(s) of network effects involved and the relevant market(s). Second, a multi-market setting typically calls for scaled network sizes. Third, controlling for intertemporal changes in network quality may be imperative. Finally, indicators at the individual and aggregate levels should not be mixed. Armed with these insights, I re-examined Madureira et al. (2013)’s results. Unlike Madureira et al., I found that Metcalfe's law fits the data better than Briscoe's law.

Keywords: Metcalfe's law; Network value; Network effects; Digital information networks; Internet (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B5 D2 D8 L9 O3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624516301081
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:37:y:2016:i:c:p:67-76

DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.09.001

Access Statistics for this article

Information Economics and Policy is currently edited by D. Waterman

More articles in Information Economics and Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().