The productivity paradox: A meta-analysis
Information Economics and Policy, 2017, vol. 38, issue C, 38-54
The impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on economic performance has been the subject of academic research for several decades, and despite the remarkable and significant innovation in computer technology, usage, and investments, only a small growth in productivity has been observed. This observations has been coined the productivity paradox. This paper uses meta-analytical methods to examine publication bias and the size of ICT elasticity. The empirical part is based on a collection of more than 800 estimates of ICT payoff effects from more than 70 studies written in the last 20 years. The meta-analysis reveals a strong presence of publication bias within the ICT productivity literature and, using a mixed effect multilevel model, estimates the ICT elasticity to be only 0.3%, which is more than ten times smaller than what was reported by a previous meta-analysis from 10 years ago.
Keywords: Meta-analysis; Meta-regression analysis; Publication bias; Productivity paradox; Solow paradox; Productivity; Firm; ICT elasticity; IT payoff; Information technology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 O12 O32 D24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: The productivity paradox: A Meta-analysis (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:38:y:2017:i:c:p:38-54
Access Statistics for this article
Information Economics and Policy is currently edited by D. Waterman
More articles in Information Economics and Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().