Exploring the impact of artificial Intelligence: Prediction versus judgment
Joshua Gans () and
Avi Goldfarb ()
Information Economics and Policy, 2019, vol. 47, issue C, 1-6
Based on recent developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), we examine what type of human labor will be a substitute versus a complement to emerging technologies. We argue that these recent developments reduce the costs of providing a particular set of tasks – prediction tasks. Prediction about uncertain states of the world is an input into decision-making. We show that prediction allows riskier decisions to be taken and this is its impact on observed productivity although it could also increase the variance of outcomes as well. We consider the role of human judgment in decision-making as prediction technology improves. Judgment is exercised when the objective function for a particular set of decisions cannot be described (i.e., coded). However, we demonstrate that better prediction impacts the returns to different types of judgment in opposite ways. Hence, not all human judgment will be a complement to AI. Finally, we show that humans will delegate some decisions to machines even when the decision would be superior with human input.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence: Prediction versus Judgment (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:iepoli:v:47:y:2019:i:c:p:1-6
Access Statistics for this article
Information Economics and Policy is currently edited by D. Waterman
More articles in Information Economics and Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().