EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A global view of productivity growth in China

Chang-Tai Hsieh and Ralph Ossa

Journal of International Economics, 2016, vol. 102, issue C, 209-224

Abstract: How does a country's productivity growth affect worldwide real incomes through international trade? In this paper, we take this classic question to the data by measuring the spillover effects of China's productivity growth. Using a quantitative trade model, we first estimate China's productivity growth between 1995 and 2007 and then isolate what would have happened to real incomes around the world if only China's productivity had changed. We find that the spillover effects are small for all countries in our sample, ranging from a cumulative real income loss of at most −0.2% to a cumulative real income gain of at most 0.2%.

Keywords: Spillovers; Productivity growth; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F1 F4 O4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (78)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002219961630085X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: A Global View of Productivity Growth in China (2011) Downloads
Working Paper: A Global View of Productivity Growth in China (2011) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:102:y:2016:i:c:p:209-224

DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.07.007

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:102:y:2016:i:c:p:209-224