Does a currency union need a capital market union?
Joseba Martinez,
Thomas Philippon and
Markus Sihvonen
Journal of International Economics, 2022, vol. 139, issue C
Abstract:
We compare risk sharing in response to demand and supply shocks in four types of currency unions: segmented markets; a money market union; a capital market union; and complete financial markets. We show that a money market union is efficient at sharing domestic demand shocks (deleveraging, fiscal consolidation), while a capital market union is necessary to share supply shocks (productivity and quality shocks). In a numerical exercise, we find that the welfare gain of moving from segmented markets to a money market union is of roughly similar magnitude to that of moving from a money market to a capital market union.
Keywords: Risk sharing; Currency union; Banking union; Capital market union; Incomplete markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E44 F36 F45 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199622001076
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Does a Currency Union Need a Capital market Union? (2019)
Working Paper: Does a Currency Union Need a Capital Market Union? (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:139:y:2022:i:c:s0022199622001076
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103675
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and RodrÃguez-Clare, Andrés
More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().