EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Did US safeguards resuscitate Harley-Davidson in the 1980s?

Taiju Kitano and Hiroshi Ohashi ()

Journal of International Economics, 2009, vol. 79, issue 2, 186-197

Abstract: This paper examines US safeguards applied to the motorcycle market in the 1980s. After receiving temporary protection by means of a maximum tariff of over 45%, Harley-Davidson sales recovered dramatically. Simulations, based on structural demand and supply estimates, indicate that while safeguard tariffs did benefit Harley-Davidson, they only account for a fraction of its increased sales. This is primarily because consumers perceived that Harley-Davidson and Japanese large motorcycles were poorly matched substitutes for each other. Our results provide little evidence that safeguard provisions triggered restructuring in Harley-Davidson.

Keywords: Safeguard; Tariff; Random; coefficient; discrete; choice; model; Motorcycles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022-1996(09)00095-6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Did US Safeguards Resuscitate Harley-Davidson in the 1980s? (2009) Downloads
Working Paper: Did U.S. Safeguard Resuscitate Harley Davidson in the 1980s? (2007) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:79:y:2009:i:2:p:186-197

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().

 
Page updated 2021-02-08
Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:79:y:2009:i:2:p:186-197