EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sovereign default and debt renegotiation

Vivian Yue

Journal of International Economics, 2010, vol. 80, issue 2, 176-187

Abstract: This paper develops a small open economy model to study sovereign default and debt renegotiation for emerging economies. The model features both endogenous default and endogenous debt recovery rates. Sovereign bonds are priced to compensate creditors for the risk of default and the risk of debt restructuring. The model captures the interaction between sovereign default and ex post debt renegotiation. We find that both debt recovery rates and sovereign bond prices decrease with the level of debt. In a quantitative analysis, the model accounts for the debt reduction, volatile and countercyclical bond spreads, countercyclical trade balance, and other empirical regularities of the Argentine economy. The model also replicates the dynamics of bond spreads during the debt crisis in Argentina.

Keywords: Sovereign; default; Debt; renegotiation; Recovery; rate; Sovereign; debt; spreads (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (277)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022-1996(09)00137-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Sovereign Default and Debt Renegotiation (2005) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:80:y:2010:i:2:p:176-187

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:80:y:2010:i:2:p:176-187