EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The quality of a firm's exports: Where you export to matters

Paulo Bastos and Joana Silva

Journal of International Economics, 2010, vol. 82, issue 2, 99-111

Abstract: What drives export quality? Using Portuguese firm-level data on exports by product and destination market, we find that f.o.b. unit values increase systematically with distance, and tend to be higher in shipments to richer nations. These relationships reflect not only the sorting of firms across markets, but also the within-firm variation of unit values across destinations. Within product categories, higher-productivity firms tend to ship greater quantities at higher prices to a given market, consistent with higher quality. In addition, firm productivity tends to magnify the positive effect of distance on within-product unit values, suggesting that high-productivity, high-quality firms are more able to serve difficult markets.

Keywords: Firm-level; exporting; Product; quality; Destination; market; Firm; heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (244)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022-1996(10)00063-2
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The Quality of a Firm’s Exports: Where you Export to Matters (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:82:y:2010:i:2:p:99-111

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:82:y:2010:i:2:p:99-111