EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Understanding interstate trade patterns

Hakan Yilmazkuday

Journal of International Economics, 2012, vol. 86, issue 1, 158-166

Abstract: This paper models and estimates bilateral trade patterns of U.S. states in a CES framework and identifies the elasticity of substitution across goods, the elasticities of substitution across varieties of each good, and the good-specific elasticities of distance by using markup values obtained from the production side. Compared to the international trade literature, the elasticity of substitution estimates are lower across both goods and varieties, while the elasticity of distance estimates are higher. Although home-bias effects at the state level are significant, there is evidence for decreasing effects over time.

Keywords: Trade patterns; Elasticity of substitution; Elasticity of distance; The United States (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F12 R12 R32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (43)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199611001139
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Understanding Interstate Trade Patterns (2011) Downloads
Working Paper: Understanding Interstate Trade Patterns (2009) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:86:y:2012:i:1:p:158-166

DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.08.015

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:86:y:2012:i:1:p:158-166