EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sovereign default risk and commitment for fiscal adjustment

Carlos Goncalves and Bernardo Guimaraes

Journal of International Economics, 2015, vol. 95, issue 1, 68-82

Abstract: This paper studies fiscal policy in a model of sovereign debt and default. A time inconsistency problem arises: since the price of past debt cannot be affected by current fiscal policy and governments cannot credibly commit to a certain path of tax rates, debtor countries choose suboptimally low fiscal adjustments. An international organization, capable of designing a contract that coaxes debtors into a tougher fiscal stance via the provision of cheap senior lending in times of crisis, can work as a commitment device and improve social welfare.

Keywords: Fiscal adjustment; Sovereign debt; Sovereign default; Time inconsistency; IMF (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F33 F34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199614001408
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Sovereign default risk and commitment for fiscal adjustment (2012) Downloads
Working Paper: Sovereign default risk and commitment for fiscal adjustment (2012) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:95:y:2015:i:1:p:68-82

DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.11.008

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:inecon:v:95:y:2015:i:1:p:68-82