A general optimal approach to Bühlmann credibility theory

Yujie Yan and Kai-Sheng Song

Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2022, vol. 104, issue C, 262-282

Abstract: Arguably almost all developments in modern credibility theory have been based on Bühlmann's fundamental Bayes approach to credibility. Despite its simple and widespread applicability, Bühlmann's approach leads to a linear Bayesian credibility estimator that is not robust and sensitive to heavy-tailed excess claims and may not accurately approximate a non-linear Bayesian credibility estimator. Since it is based on the sample mean, the linear credibility estimator cannot even be calculated when neither the sample mean nor the individual-level claim data are available. We present a mathematically rigorous extension of Bühlmann credibility theory and propose a general method based on an optimally weighted linear combination of multiple credibility estimators. Our approach allows various linear and nonlinear estimators with potentially different desirable properties such as robustness and efficiency to be incorporated in a dependence framework. We show that the best weights are optimal not only for finite samples but also converge to the asymptotic optimal weights. Furthermore, we introduce some finite-sample weights based on the leading terms of our asymptotic solution. These weights show remarkable performance compared with the optimal finite-sample weights while they are still relatively easy to compute for certain estimators. We perform Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the optimal performance in finite samples. We analyze a real-world insurance claims dataset to further illustrate the usefulness and the prediction accuracy of our proposed method.

Keywords: Asymptotic and finite-sample optimal weights; Heavy-tailed claims distributions; Leading-terms approximation; Minimum mean squared error; Multiple non-linear credibility estimators; Prediction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C11 C13 C18 G22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668722000245
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:insuma:v:104:y:2022:i:c:p:262-282

DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.02.003

Access Statistics for this article

Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is currently edited by R. Kaas, Hansjoerg Albrecher, M. J. Goovaerts and E. S. W. Shiu

More articles in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().