 Convex and Lorenz orders under balance correction in nonlife insurance pricing: Review and new developmentsMichel Denuit and Julien Trufin Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2024, vol. 118, issue C, 123-128 Abstract: By exploiting massive amounts of data, machine learning techniques provide actuaries with predictors exhibiting high correlation with claim frequencies and severities. However, these predictors generally fail to achieve financial equilibrium and thus do not qualify as pure premiums. Autocalibration effectively addresses this issue since it ensures that every group of policyholders paying the same premium is on average self-financing. Balance correction has been proposed as a way to make any candidate premium autocalibrated with the added advantage that it improves out-of-sample Bregman divergence and hence predictive Tweedie deviance. This paper proves that balance correction is also beneficial in terms of concentration curves and derives conditions ensuring that the initial predictor and its balance-corrected version are ordered in Lorenz order. Finally, criteria are proposed to rank the balance-corrected versions of two competing predictors in the convex order. Keywords: Tweedie deviance; Bregman divergence; Financial equilibrium; Concentration curve; Convex order; Lorenz order (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:insuma:v:118:y:2024:i:c:p:123-128 DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.06.003 Access Statistics for this article Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is currently edited by R. Kaas, Hansjoerg Albrecher, M. J. Goovaerts and E. S. W. Shiu More articles in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.