EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Adverse selection or advantageous selection? Risk and underwriting in China's health-insurance market

Feng Gao, Michael Powers () and Jun Wang

Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2009, vol. 44, issue 3, 505-510

Abstract: Using data from China's individual health-insurance market, we study the problem of information asymmetry. Our preliminary results appear to contradict standard-model predictions, showing that higher-risk buyers are more likely to purchase "additional" insurance than lower-risk buyers, but that they also tend to purchase lower limits of "basic" insurance coverage. We therefore develop a theoretical model to capture the effects of buyers' wealth levels and loss amounts, and show empirically that these effects, in the context of asymmetric information, lead to the coexistence of adverse selection and advantageous selection in China's health-insurance market.

Keywords: Asymmetric; information; Adverse; selection; Advantageous; selection; Probit; analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6687(09)00011-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:insuma:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:505-510

Access Statistics for this article

Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is currently edited by R. Kaas, Hansjoerg Albrecher, M. J. Goovaerts and E. S. W. Shiu

More articles in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:505-510