Economics at your fingertips  

Redistribution of longevity risk: The effect of heterogeneous mortality beliefs

Tim J. Boonen, Anja De Waegenaere () and Henk Norde

Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2017, vol. 72, issue C, 175-188

Abstract: Existing literature regarding the natural hedge potential that arises from combining different longevity-linked liabilities typically does not address the question how changes in the liability mix can be obtained. We consider firms who aim to exploit the benefits of natural hedge potential by redistributing their risks, and characterize the risk redistributions that will arise when the parties bargain for a redistribution of risk that weakly benefits them all. We analyze the effects of heterogeneity in the beliefs regarding the probability distribution of future mortality rates on the properties of these risk redistributions, and provide a numerical illustration for a case where an insurer with a portfolio of term assurance contracts and a pension fund with a portfolio of life annuities redistribute their risks.

Keywords: Risk redistribution; Longevity risk; Nash bargaining; Heterogeneous beliefs; Natural hedge potential (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 C78 G22 J11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is currently edited by R. Kaas, Hansjoerg Albrecher, M. J. Goovaerts and E. S. W. Shiu

More articles in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2019-10-12
Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:72:y:2017:i:c:p:175-188