Insurance loss coverage and demand elasticities
Angus S. Macdonald,
Pradip Tapadar and
R. Guy Thomas
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2018, vol. 79, issue C, 15-25
Restrictions on insurance risk classification may induce adverse selection, which is usually perceived as a bad outcome. We suggest a counter-argument to this perception in circumstances where modest levels of adverse selection lead to an increase in ‘loss coverage’, defined as expected losses compensated by insurance for the whole population. This happens if the shift in coverage towards higher risks under adverse selection more than offsets the fall in number of individuals insured. The possibility of this outcome depends on insurance demand elasticities for higher and lower risks. We state elasticity conditions which ensure that for any downward-sloping insurance demand functions, loss coverage when all risks are pooled at a common price is higher than under fully risk-differentiated prices. Empirical evidence suggests that these conditions may be realistic for some insurance markets.
Keywords: Adverse selection; Loss coverage; Elasticity of demand; Arc elasticity of demand; Heterogeneous risk preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:insuma:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:15-25
Access Statistics for this article
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is currently edited by R. Kaas, Hansjoerg Albrecher, M. J. Goovaerts and E. S. W. Shiu
More articles in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().