 Risk aggregation in non-life insurance: Standard models vs. internal modelsMartin Eling and Kwangmin Jung Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2020, vol. 95, issue C, 183-198 Abstract: Standard models for capital requirements restrict the correlation between risk factors to the linear measure and disregard undertaking-specific parameters. We consider an alternative framework for risk aggregation in non-life insurance using vine copulas that allow non-linear dependence and are estimated with undertaking-specific parameters. We empirically compare our alternative risk model with three regulatory standard models (Korean risk-based capital, Solvency II, Swiss Solvency Test) and show that the standard models lead to more than 50% higher capital requirements on average. Half of the overestimation results from the uniform parameter selection imposed by regulations and the other half comes from the linear correlation assumption. The differences might distort competition when both standard models and internal risk models are used in a single market. Keywords: Insurance regulation; Risk aggregation; Vine copula; Capital requirements; Internal Models (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:insuma:v:95:y:2020:i:c:p:183-198 DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.09.003 Access Statistics for this article Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is currently edited by R. Kaas, Hansjoerg Albrecher, M. J. Goovaerts and E. S. W. Shiu More articles in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.