Banks' procyclical behavior: Does provisioning matter?
Vincent Bouvatier () and
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2008, vol. 18, issue 5, 513-526
A panel of 186 European banks is used for the period 1992-2004 to determine if banking behaviors, induced by the capital adequacy constraint and the provisioning system, amplify credit fluctuations. We find that poorly capitalized banks are constrained to expand credit. We also find that loan loss provisions (LLP) made in order to cover expected future loan losses (non-discretionary LLP) amplify credit fluctuations. By contrast, LLP used for management objectives (discretionary LLP) do not affect credit fluctuations. The findings of our research are consistent with the call for the implementation of a dynamic provisioning system in Europe.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (64) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Banks' procyclical behavior: Does provisioning matter? (2008)
Working Paper: Banks' Procyclical Behavior: Does Provisioning Matter? (2008)
Working Paper: Banks’ procyclical behavior: Does provisioning matter? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfin:v:18:y:2008:i:5:p:513-526
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money is currently edited by I. Mathur and C. J. Neely
More articles in Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().