Financial firm bankruptcy and systemic risk

Jean Helwege

Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2010, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Financial firm distress often leads to regulatory intervention, such as "too big to fail" (TBTF) policies. Two oft-cited channels to justify TBTF are domino effects (counterparty risk) and the effects of fire sales. We analyze the policy responses for avoiding systemic risk while considering the role of these two factors. Prior bankruptcies suggest that cascades caused by counterparty risk do not occur, as firms diversify their exposures. Instead, crises tend to be symptomatic of common factors in financial firms' portfolios, which lead to widespread instances of declining asset values and which are often misinterpreted as resulting from fire sales.

Keywords: Financial; institutions; Systemic; risk; Too; big; to; fail; Fire; sales; Counterparty; risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042-4431(09)00051-1
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfin:v:20:y:2010:i:1:p:1-12

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money is currently edited by I. Mathur and C. J. Neely

More articles in Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().