 When do characteristics-sorted factors mechanically explain returns?Irina Murtazashvili and Nadia Vozlyublennaia Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2013, vol. 25, issue C, 119-143 Abstract: This paper demonstrates that the factors based on typical procedures that employ sorting by characteristics (including size and book-to-market, among others) can create a good mechanical fit in the regressions of portfolio returns. Such factors are approximately linear functions of the sorted portfolios, and including them into regressions adds linear restrictions on the intercepts. These restrictions mechanically reduce significance of the time-series regression intercepts, increase the regression R2, and lead to a good fit in the cross-sectional regressions. Our simulation evidence confirms these propositions. Moreover, we show that popular size and value factors do not “work” in the sets of asset portfolios, which they are not mechanically related to. These results cast doubt on the interpretation of characteristics-sorted factors as the true risk factors. Keywords: Risk factors; Security returns; Size and value factors; Characteristics sorting (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfin:v:25:y:2013:i:c:p:119-143 DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2013.01.006 Access Statistics for this article Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money is currently edited by I. Mathur and C. J. Neely More articles in Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.