U.S. prompt corrective action and bank risk
Rhys ap Gwilym,
Angelos Kanas and
Philip Molyneux ()
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2013, vol. 26, issue C, 239-257
This paper examines whether Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) was effective in reducing default and credit risk in U.S. banking. We employ parametric, non-parametric, nonlinear and switching cointegration tests and a general-to-specific testing procedure to examine if PCA-defined bank ratios and risk measures share common stochastic trends. We find strong evidence of switching cointegration between PCA-defined ratios and default risk. This occurs in 1993 and coincides with the adoption of PCA legislation. We conclude that PCA is effective in reducing default risk. In contrast, there is no clear evidence of cointegration between the PCA-defined ratios and credit risk. Our findings show that tougher capital standards mitigate default risk and therefore provide indirect support for current on-going capital regulation.
Keywords: Prompt corrective action; Credit risk; Default risk; Cointegration; Switching cointegration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 G18 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfin:v:26:y:2013:i:c:p:239-257
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money is currently edited by I. Mathur and C. J. Neely
More articles in Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().