The state of presidential election forecasting: The 2004 experience

Randall J. Jones

International Journal of Forecasting, 2008, vol. 24, issue 2, 310-321

Abstract: This paper assesses the current state of U. S. presidential election forecasting, describing forecast methods and their predictive accuracies for the most recent election, 2004. Three types of forecasts were made for the election using the methods noted: 1) point forecasts of the popular vote (by campaign polls, futures contracts on candidates' performance, regression models, Delphi expert surveys, and a combination of forecasts from these methods); 2) point forecasts of the electoral vote (by regression models, probability models based on state polls, a compilation of median polls in states, and exit polls); and 3) dichotomous forecasts of the popular-vote winner (by a multi-indicator index, cut-points for single indicators, and bellwether states). Candidate futures provided the most accurate popular-vote forecasts. A state probability model and the median state poll technique were the most accurate electoral vote methods. All three dichotomous techniques successfully predicted the election winner.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169-2070(08)00034-4
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:24:y:2008:i:2:p:310-321

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman

More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().