EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Quantifying survey expectations: A critical review and generalization of the Carlson–Parkin method

Kajal Lahiri and Yongchen Zhao

International Journal of Forecasting, 2015, vol. 31, issue 1, 51-62

Abstract: This paper provides a critical review of the popular Carlson–Parkin (CP) quantification method using household-level data from the University of Michigan’s Survey of Consumers. We find strong evidence against the threshold constancy, symmetry, homogeneity, and overall unbiasedness assumptions of the CP method. To address these violations, we generalize the CP method using a hierarchical ordered probit (HOPIT) model. By comparing the quantified inflation expectations with quantitative expectations obtained from the same set of households directly, we show that the generalized model performs better than the CP method. In particular, when the CP unbiasedness assumption is replaced by a time-varying calibration, the resulting quantified series is found to track the quantitative benchmark well, over diverse time periods.

Keywords: HOPIT model; Household data; Inflation rate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207014000995
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:31:y:2015:i:1:p:51-62

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.003

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman

More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:31:y:2015:i:1:p:51-62