 A comparison of MIDAS and bridge equationsInternational Journal of Forecasting, 2016, vol. 32, issue 2, 257-270 Abstract: This paper compares two single-equation approaches from the recent nowcasting literature: mixed-data sampling (MIDAS) regressions and bridge equations. Both approaches are suitable for nowcasting low-frequency variables such as the quarterly GDP using higher-frequency business cycle indicators. Three differences between the approaches are identified: (1) MIDAS is a direct multi-step nowcasting tool, whereas bridge equations provide iterated forecasts; (2) the weighting of high-frequency predictor observations in MIDAS is based on functional lag polynomials, whereas the bridge equation weights are fixed partly by time aggregation; (3) for parameter estimation, the MIDAS equations consider current-quarter leads of high-frequency indicators, whereas bridge equations typically do not. To assist in discussing the differences between the approaches in isolation, intermediate specifications between MIDAS and bridge equations are provided. The alternative models are compared in an empirical application to nowcasting GDP growth in the Euro area, given a large set of business cycle indicators. Keywords: Mixed-data sampling; Bridge equations; Nowcasting (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:32:y:2016:i:2:p:257-270 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.07.004 Access Statistics for this article International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.