The forecast combination puzzle: A simple theoretical explanation

Gerda Claeskens, Jan Magnus (), Andrey Vasnev and Wendun Wang

International Journal of Forecasting, 2016, vol. 32, issue 3, 754-762

Abstract: This paper offers a theoretical explanation for the stylized fact that forecast combinations with estimated optimal weights often perform poorly in applications. The properties of the forecast combination are typically derived under the assumption that the weights are fixed, while in practice they need to be estimated. If the fact that the weights are random rather than fixed is taken into account during the optimality derivation, then the forecast combination will be biased (even when the original forecasts are unbiased), and its variance will be larger than in the fixed-weight case. In particular, there is no guarantee that the ‘optimal’ forecast combination will be better than the equal-weight case, or even improve on the original forecasts. We provide the underlying theory, some special cases, and a numerical illustration.

Keywords: Forecast combination; Optimal weights (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (117)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207016000327
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The forecast combination puzzle: a simple theoretical explanation (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:32:y:2016:i:3:p:754-762

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.12.005

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman

More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().