Partisan bias, attribute substitution, and the benefits of an indirect format for eliciting forecasts and judgments of trend

David A. Comerford and Jack B. Soll

International Journal of Forecasting, 2025, vol. 41, issue 2, 702-715

Abstract: A majority of Americans reported the economy to be worsening when objective indicators showed it to be recovering. We show that this is symptomatic of attribute substitution—people answer a taxing question as though asked a related easy-to-answer question. An implication of attribute substitution is that forecasts will vary across a direct format, which asks whether the economy will be better in 12 months, versus an indirect format, which asks respondents to rate both current conditions and the conditions they expect for 12 months’ time. We compare these formats in three studies and over 2,000 respondents. Relative to the direct format, the indirect format delivers trends that show greater consensus across Republicans and Democrats; are less equivocal about the course of the US economy; and are more realistic about the magnitude of change in opinion poll data.

Keywords: Attribute substitution; Judgment of trends; Comparison processes; Ideology; Partisan bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207024001092
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:2:p:702-715

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.11.005

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman

More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().