The decrease in confidence with forecast extremity

Doron Sonsino and Yefim Roth

International Journal of Forecasting, 2025, vol. 41, issue 3, 877-893

Abstract: A large panel of chief financial officers’ forecasts of the S&P 500 annual returns and four experiments suggest that forecast confidence decreases as the forecasts diverge from zero, in the positive or negative direction. This decreased confidence is reflected in longer forecast intervals, larger perceived volatility estimates, and weaker belief in the accuracy of the predictions. De Bondt’s (1993) forecast hedging intensifies with the extremity of the forecasts, but the decrease in confidence is sustained when the intervals are symmetrized. Imposing cumulative prospect theory preferences on the CFOs, permutation tests show that the decreased confidence delays the response to optimistic expectations and alleviates miscalibration, although the optimistic CFOs still discount the VIX by more than 50%. The paper thus reveals a self-corrective mechanism that partially, but far from fully, offsets the overconfidence hazards.

Keywords: Forecast confidence; Overconfidence; Prospect theory; Forecast hedging; Perceived volatility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207024000712
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:3:p:877-893

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.07.004

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman

More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().