Unraveling the effect of engagement and consistency in the results of the M6 forecasting competition
Anastasios Kaltsounis,
Evangelos Theodorou,
Evangelos Spiliotis and
Vassilios Assimakopoulos
International Journal of Forecasting, 2025, vol. 41, issue 4, 1404-1412
Abstract:
The M6 competition evaluated investment performance over a period of one year, contributing to the efficient market hypothesis debate. This paper provides further insights into the outcomes of the competition by unraveling the effect that team engagement and performance consistency had on the final results. First, we identify three different types of engagement and investigate their relationship with portfolio efficiency, also making useful observations about the learning effect implied by a re-submission process. Then, we analyze the monthly performance of the teams and determine whether it aligned with their global performance or was affected significantly by extreme instances. Our results suggest that consistency is more important than engagement for making profitable investments. Nevertheless, we identify many cases where both regular portfolio updates and luck provided an advantage.
Keywords: Forecasting competitions; M6; Forecast performance; Investment decisions; Trading (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920702500038X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:4:p:1404-1412
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.04.002
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Forecasting is currently edited by R. J. Hyndman
More articles in International Journal of Forecasting from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().