EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sharing is daring: An experiment on consent, chilling effects and a salient privacy nudge

Yoan Hermstrüwer and Stephan Dickert

International Review of Law and Economics, 2017, vol. 51, issue C, 38-49

Abstract: Privacy law rests on the assumption that government surveillance may increase the general level of conformity and thus generate a chilling effect. In a study that combines elements of a lab and a field experiment, we show that salient and incentivized consent options are sufficient to trigger this behavioral effect. Salient ex ante consent options may lure people into giving up their privacy and increase their compliance with social norms – even when the only immediate risk of sharing information is mere publicity on a Google website. A right to be forgotten (right to deletion), however, seems to reduce neither privacy valuations nor chilling effects. In spite of low deletion costs people tend to stick with a retention default. The study suggests that consent architectures may play out on social conformity rather than on consent choices and privacy valuations. Salient notice and consent options may not merely empower users to make an informed consent decision. Instead, they can trigger the very effects that privacy law intends to curb.

Keywords: Behavioral law and economics; Privacy law; Chilling effects; Consent; Right to be forgotten; Dictator games; Social image; Social norms; Nudges (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 C91 C93 D03 K29 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818817300170
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:38-49

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. Schäfer

More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2018-01-30
Handle: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:38-49