Securities settlements as examples of crisis-driven regulation
Anita Anand and
Andrew Green
International Review of Law and Economics, 2018, vol. 55, issue C, 41-57
Abstract:
International bodies have criticized Canadian financial markets for being lax in the area of enforcement. We examine whether such criticisms are applicable to settlements struck by the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC). We reach a number of important findings. First, the total number of parties sanctioned and the total amount of payments made to the OSC increased after the 2008 financial crisis, although these numbers decreased in subsequent years. Second, there is no discernible trend in the types of proceedings by which cases were concluded, although the OSC does use settlements more than other provincial regulators. Third, corporations, first-time offenders, and financial service companies are more likely than individuals or repeat offenders to settle and the OSC tends to settle less often when the case involves serious offences such as fraud or manipulation. Finally, penalties imposed as a result of a settlement were not statistically different than those imposed in a hearing. Interestingly, while there are outliers, financial service companies did not pay higher penalties than other parties, nor did repeat offenders although this has recently changed with the introduction of no-contest settlements. Our data support the idea that regulatory activity follows a cyclical pattern and, following a crisis, regulatory activity increases.
Keywords: Securities; Settlements; Regulators; Crisis; Financial crisis; Enforcement; Regulatory law; Securities law; Canada (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818818300619
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:41-57
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2018.03.001
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. Schäfer
More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().