A note on replication analysis

Sven Hoeppner

International Review of Law and Economics, 2019, vol. 59, issue C, 98-102

Abstract: This short note surveys the cornerstones of the current literature on replication analysis. Researcher discretion is surprisingly large, regarding both choice of which question to ask and choice of which methods to employ. Therefore, I conclude, transparency in exercising said researcher discretion is important when assessing how replication results relate to original results.

Keywords: Experimental law and economics; Replication; Replication analysis; Frequentist statistics; Bayesian model comparison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818819301395
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:59:y:2019:i:c:p:98-102

DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2019.05.004

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. Schäfer

More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().