An experimental test of two policies to increase donations to public projects
Raúl López-Pérez and
International Review of Law and Economics, 2020, vol. 62, issue C
This paper uses lab-in-the-field experiments and theory to explore why people give money to governments. We assume that giving is motivated by outcome–oriented or consequentialist norms, and conditional on (a) others’ behavior and (b) beliefs about how competent the government is. The evidence from a lab experiment in Peru is in line with this. On the other hand, we analyze the potential effects of two policies to increase giving, observing that less people give zero if they are informed about (i) two specific government projects (a subway line and a children’s hospital) or (ii) that some well-known Olympic medalist pays punctually her taxes, according to public information released by the Peruvian tax Agency. Our findings contribute to a burgeoning literature on tax morale and are arguably relevant to understand taxpayers’ non-selfish reasons to pay (or evade) their taxes.
Keywords: Donations; Peer effects; Public projects; Social norms; Tax morale (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D91 H21 H26 H30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0144818819301115
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. SchÃ¤fer
More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().