EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

In defense of fair value: Weighing the evidence on earnings management and asset securitizations

Mary Barth and Daniel Taylor

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2010, vol. 49, issue 1-2, 26-33

Abstract: Dechow, Myers, and Shakespeare (DMS, 2009) find a negative relation between income from securitization activities and income from non-securitization activities. DMS interprets this finding as indicating that managers use the flexibility available in fair value accounting rules to smooth earnings. We clarify the role of fair value in accounting for asset securitizations, discuss alternative explanations for the evidence presented in DMS, and offer suggestions for future research. We caution against inferring the desirability of any particular accounting method from earnings management research.

Keywords: JEL; classification:; G20; G30; M41; Asset; securitizations; Securitization; income; Earnings; management; Fair; value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165-4101(09)00054-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:49:y:2010:i:1-2:p:26-33

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting and Economics is currently edited by J. L. Zimmerman, S. P. Kothari, T. Z. Lys and R. L. Watts

More articles in Journal of Accounting and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().

 
Page updated 2020-10-03
Handle: RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:49:y:2010:i:1-2:p:26-33