Do financial analysts' long-term growth forecasts matter? Evidence from stock recommendations and career outcomes
Boochun Jung,
Philip B. Shane and
Yanhua Sunny Yang
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2012, vol. 53, issue 1, 55-76
Abstract:
Prior literature portrays long-term growth (LTG) forecasts as nonsensical from a valuation perspective. Instead, we hypothesize that LTG forecasts signal high effort and ability to analyze firms' long-term prospects. We document stronger market response to stock recommendation revisions of analysts who publish accompanying LTG forecasts. We also hypothesize and find that these analysts are less likely to leave the profession or move to smaller brokerage houses. Consistent with Reg. FD's intention to promote fundamental analysis of long-term earnings prospects, post-Reg. FD observations drive our results. Overall, we identify previously undocumented benefits accruing to analysts who publish LTG forecasts.
Keywords: Financial analysts; Long-term growth; Analysts' forecasts; Analysts' career outcomes; Value-relevance; Stock recommendations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165410111000905
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:53:y:2012:i:1:p:55-76
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.002
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Accounting and Economics is currently edited by J. L. Zimmerman, S. P. Kothari, T. Z. Lys and R. L. Watts
More articles in Journal of Accounting and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().