Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior

Rajiv D. Banker, Dmitri Byzalov and Chen, Lei (Tony)

Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2013, vol. 55, issue 1, 111-127

Abstract: Central to the economic theory of sticky costs is the proposition that managers consider adjustment costs when changing resource levels. We test this proposition using employment protection legislation (EPL) provisions in different countries as a proxy for labor adjustment costs. Using a large sample of firms in 19 OECD countries during 1990–2008, we find that the degree of cost stickiness at the firm level varies with the strictness of the country-level EPL provisions. This finding supports the theory that cost stickiness reflects the deliberate resource commitment decisions of managers in the presence of adjustment costs.

Keywords: Sticky costs; Employment protection legislation; Labor adjustment costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (100)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165410112000614
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:55:y:2013:i:1:p:111-127

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting and Economics is currently edited by J. L. Zimmerman, S. P. Kothari, T. Z. Lys and R. L. Watts

More articles in Journal of Accounting and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().