Third-party consequences of short-selling threats: The case of auditor behavior
Danqi Hu and
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2017, vol. 63, issue 2, 479-498
This study examines how short-selling threats affect auditors. During 2005–2007, the SEC ordered a pilot program in which one-third of the Russell 3000 index firms were arbitrarily chosen to be exempted from short-sale price tests. As a result, these stocks faced significantly higher short-selling threats. We implement a difference-in-differences test with firm fixed effects to show that auditors react to the increased threats and charge higher audit fees to the pilot firms. Further, we find that the impact only exists when auditors are concerned with the bankruptcy risk or when managers are less likely disciplined by short sellers.
Keywords: Short selling; Audit fees; Regulation SHO; Bankruptcy risk; CEO overconfidence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:63:y:2017:i:2:p:479-498
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Accounting and Economics is currently edited by J. L. Zimmerman, S. P. Kothari, T. Z. Lys and R. L. Watts
More articles in Journal of Accounting and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().