How should we measure the performance of corporate bond mutual funds? Evaluating model quality and impact on inferences

Yuekun Liu and Timothy B. Riley

Journal of Banking & Finance, 2025, vol. 173, issue C

Abstract: The performance of corporate bond mutual funds tends to be estimated using models with limited empirical validation. We survey the literature to determine the models in use and develop a representative set of models. Testing that set of models, we find considerable variation in quality, with the most effective models sharing common traits. We recommend, among the tested models, the four-factor model proposed by Jones and Mo (2021). Regarding the stylized facts of corporate bond fund performance, our recommended model produces notable deviations from the prior literature and other models, including less evidence of positive alphas not attributable to luck.

Keywords: Mutual fund; Corporate bond; Model; Alpha; Stylized facts; Performance; Skill; Persistence; Active; Flow (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624002814
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:173:y:2025:i:c:s0378426624002814

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107367

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Banking & Finance is currently edited by Ike Mathur

More articles in Journal of Banking & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().