Information acquisition, coordination, and fundamentals in a financial crisis
Maxim Nikitin () and
Richard Smith
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008, vol. 32, issue 6, 907-914
Abstract:
This paper reconciles the two explanations of a financial crisis, the self-fulfilling prophecy and the fundamental causes, in an empirically-relevant framework, by explicitly modeling the costly voluntary acquisition of information about fundamentals in a variant of Diamond and Dybvig [Diamond, D., Dybvig, P., 1983. Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy 91, 401-419]. The model exhibits strategic complementarity in information acquisition. In the "partial run" equilibrium investors engage in costly evaluation of projects, so that banks with lower-return projects fail. There also exist the classic "full-run" and "no-run" equilibria in which there is no project evaluation. Investors' coordination on a specific equilibrium is triggered by a self-fulfilling prophecy. So, financial crises are seen as both fundamentals-based and self-fulfilling prophecies-based phenomena.
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-4266(07)00272-5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:32:y:2008:i:6:p:907-914
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Banking & Finance is currently edited by Ike Mathur
More articles in Journal of Banking & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().