Institutional investor stability and crash risk: Monitoring versus short-termism?

Jeffrey L. Callen and Xiaohua Fang

Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, vol. 37, issue 8, 3047-3063

Abstract: This study tests two opposing views of institutional investors—monitoring versus short-termism. We present evidence that institutional investor stability is negatively associated with 1-year-ahead stock price crash risk, consistent with the monitoring theory of institutional investors but not the short-termism theory. Our findings are shown to be robust to alternative empirical specifications, estimation methods and endogeneity concerns. In addition, we find that institutional ownership by public pension funds (bank trusts, investment companies, and independent investment advisors) is significantly negatively (positively) associated with future crash risk, consistent with findings that pension funds more actively monitor management than other types of institutions.

Keywords: Institutional investor stability; Crash risk; Monitoring; Short-termism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G20 G32 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (237)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426613001064
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:37:y:2013:i:8:p:3047-3063

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.018

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Banking & Finance is currently edited by Ike Mathur

More articles in Journal of Banking & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().