Yes, the CAPM is testable
Cherif Guermat
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, vol. 46, issue C, 31-42
Abstract:
It is well-known that cross-sectional tests of the CAPM are problematic. The market indexes used in empirical tests are likely to be inefficient ex ante, which could lead to spurious results even in the absence of sampling errors. This problem has led many to express serious doubt on the testability of the CAPM. In this paper I show that the CAPM is indeed testable. This paper builds on the seminal paper by Kandel and Stambaugh (1995) and proposes a two-step procedure for testing the CAPM. The first step uses a simple combination of the coefficients of determination from both Ordinary Least Squares and Generalised Least Squares estimations. This step tests whether the index used in the empirical test is efficient and whether there are no omitted factors. The second step tests the hypothesis that the efficient index is the market portfolio. The two-step approach enables testing the CAPM regardless of whether the true expected return generating process is a CAPM or a non-CAPM.
Keywords: CAPM; Market portfolio; OLS; GLS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 C18 C58 G11 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426614001629
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:46:y:2014:i:c:p:31-42
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.05.001
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Banking & Finance is currently edited by Ike Mathur
More articles in Journal of Banking & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().