Economics at your fingertips  

Risk mitigation by institutional participants in the secondary market: Evidence from foreign Rule 144A debt market

Alan G. Huang, Madhu Kalimipalli, Subhankar Nayak and Latha Ramchand

Journal of Banking & Finance, 2019, vol. 99, issue C, 202-221

Abstract: We study secondary market trades of debt issues by foreign firms in the U.S. under SEC Rule 144A, a unique market where the counterparties are qualified institutional buyers (QIBs). We find that even though the secondary yield spreads of foreign 144A debt issues are larger than comparable public debt issues by foreign and domestic firms in the U.S., the incremental impact of common risks – namely, credit, illiquidity, governance, and familiarity risks – on spreads are lower for foreign 144A issues compared to various control samples. Our finding is consistent with the notion that institutional participants, namely QIBs, play a specialized role in mitigating risk exposures in the foreign 144A secondary market.

Keywords: Foreign debt markets; 144A bonds; Secondary bond market spreads; QIBs; Risk exposure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G10 G14 G15 G30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Banking & Finance is currently edited by Ike Mathur

More articles in Journal of Banking & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2019-03-16
Handle: RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:99:y:2019:i:c:p:202-221